Therapeutics

Atabecestat

Tools

Back to the Top

Overview

Name: Atabecestat
Synonyms: JNJ-54861911 , BACE inhibitor
Therapy Type: Small Molecule (timeline)
Target Type: Amyloid-Related (timeline)
Condition(s): Alzheimer's Disease
U.S. FDA Status: Alzheimer's Disease (Discontinued)
Company: Janssen, Shionogi Pharma

Background

This is a tablet drug affecting amyloid precursor protein (APP) and its processing products. It inhibits APP cleavage by the enzyme BACE, the rate-limiting step in Aβ generation. The rationale of BACE inhibition is that it represents an upstream interference with the amyloid cascade. BACE inhibition is sometimes envisioned as long-term maintenance therapy to limit Aβ production after an initial round of immunotherapy to remove existing amyloid deposits.

In 2012, Janssen licensed this thiazine-based small-molecule compound from Shionogi, which had discovered and conducted preclinical research on it,  (Koriyama et al., 2021).

Findings

In 2013, Janssen ran a series of Phase 1 trials of JNJ-54861911. A first single-ascending-dose study in 56 healthy volunteers was followed by a second in 70 healthy elderly volunteers. Both assessed safety parameters as well as pharmacological measures relating to drug exposure and concentrations of Aβ fragments in CSF and plasma. Both were conducted in Belgium, and a similar study in 24 healthy volunteers was conducted in Japan. Additional studies in 46 healthy volunteers evaluated the effect on the concentration, metabolism, and excretion of JNJ-54861911 and of various other drugs commonly used by the elderly, including coffee, anxiolytic, or diabetes drugs. One trial in 64 people assessed whether JNJ-54861911 affects heart function. The data were published in peer-reviewed journals (Timmers et al., 2016Timmers et al., 2017Timmers et al., 2018).

In December 2013, the first trial in prodromal Alzheimer's disease began, enrolling 45 people in Belgium, the Netherlands, Spain, and Sweden. Study participants were cognitively impaired as measured by the CANTAB Elect test battery, and had evidence of amyloid deposition either as per a pathological Aβ/tau CSF assay result or per flutemetamol amyloid PET scan. Participants took either 10 or 50 mg of JNJ-54861911 or placebo once daily for four weeks, and were assessed on a range of biomarker outcomes related to drug exposure, metabolism, and target engagement, i.e., the concentration of various APP and Aβ fragments in CSF and plasma. 

In November 2014, Phase 2 began with a multinational trial in Europe. It compared a six-month, once-daily course of 10 or 50 mg of JNJ-54861911 to placebo in 114 people with a CDR rating of 0 to 0.5, plus evidence of amyloid pathology supplied either by CSF or PET—i.e., people who had asymptomatic to predementia Alzheimer's disease. This study assessed safety, exposure, target engagement, and a downstream effect in the form of CSF tau concentration, but not cognition/efficacy.

In March 2015, Janssen listed another Phase 1 trial in Japan to compare a one-month course of 10 or 50 mg to placebo in 18 people who were clinically normal as measured by a CDR of zero but had brain amyloid deposition as evidenced by low CSF Aβ42 levels. Called "asymptomatic at risk of AD," this population represents an earlier stage of AD pathophysiology than predementia or prodromal AD, as people with measurable impairment were excluded. This trial measured markers of drug exposure and target engagement. Data from this trial, and the prodromal AD trial above, were formally published (Timmers et al., 2018).

In March 2015 at the AD/PD conference in Nice, France, Janssen reported results of a single-ascending- and a multiple-ascending-dose study in healthy elderly participants. According to this presentation, the inhibitor was safe and well-tolerated in 94 people studied up to that point. It reportedly entered the blood and CSF with favorable pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, and dose-dependently reduced Aβ1-37, Aβ1-38, Aβ1-40, and Aβ1-42. Reduction of the BACE cleavage product sAPPβ tracked reduction of Aβ, whereas levels of sAPPα rose (Apr 2015 news). A 5 mg dose was reported to reduce CSF Aβ concentration by half; 25 mg by 80 percent, 50 mg by 90 percent. 

In July 2015, a long-term safety and tolerability study began enrolling 100 patients from previous Phase 1 and 2 trials who were willing to continue their randomized, blinded treatment for another year. Participants were then invited to an additional year of open-label active treatment for all.

In October 2015, a Phase 2/3 study called EARLY began enrolling asymptomatic people at risk of developing Alzheimer's dementia. Their risk was determined by a CDR score of zero combined with CSF or PET evidence of brain amyloid accumulation. The trial enrolled people aged 60 to 85. To limit screen failures, 60- to 64-year-old candidates had to have either a family history of dementia, previously known ApoE4 genotype, or previously known biomarker evidence of amyloid deposition. The primary endpoint was slowing of cognitive decline, as measured by change on the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study Preclinical Alzheimer Cognitive Composite (ADCS-PACC) between baseline and 54 months of treatment with either 10 or 25 mg of drug, or placebo. The 10 mg dose was later lowered to 5 mg. Secondary outcomes included 10 different functional, clinical, neuropsychological, exposure, and biomarker measures. This trial was to enroll 1,650 participants at 121 locations in Europe, Australia, Japan, North America, and Mexico, and run until 2023. For details on this trial, and a Phase 1 data summary, see Aug 2016 conference news.

In January 2016, Janssen added a Phase 1 study in 32 healthy adults in Germany to evaluate drug interactions between JNJ-54861911, the antidiabetic metformin, and rosuvastatin.

On May 17, 2018, Janssen announced the discontinuation of this program, citing findings of elevated liver enzymes among some of 600 people exposed to atabecestat thus far (May 2018 news). At the 2018 CTAD conference, Janssen reported that EARLY participants who took 25 mg atabecestat scored four points worse than the placebo group on the RBANS at three months, and one point worse on the PACC at six and 12 months. Treatment groups reported more depression, anxiety, and sleep problems than controls (Nov 2018 conference news). A preliminary analysis of cognitive and safety results was later published (Henley et al., 2019). Full trial data revealed that the atabecestat-induced cognitive decline reversed within six months when participants stopped taking drug, similar to what was reported for other BACE inhibitors (Sperling et al., 2021Dec 2020 news).

In 2020, Janssen published results of the Phase 2 trial and its long-term safety and tolerability extension. Its 114 participants were randomized to 10 or 50 mg atabecestat daily, or placebo, for six months. Midway through the trial, the dose was halved to 5 or 25 mg, due to a high dropout rate in the 50 mg group and liver enzyme elevations in both groups. Ninety participants continued into a one-year double-blind extension at doses of 10 or 25 mg per day or placebo, and 77 continued into the open-label phase where all received 5 or 25 mg atabecestat. Consistent with previous results, atabecestat elevated liver enzymes. In the extension study, the treated groups showed a trend toward decreasing RBANS scores, consistent with worsening cognition reported in the Phase 3 trial and with other BACE inhibitors. Open-label dosing stopped with the rest of the atabecestat program in May 2018 (Novak et al., 2020). 

Investigation of the mechanism of liver toxicity points to an immune response to atabecestat or a metabolite is responsible. In one trial volunteer who discontinued the drug due to elevated liver enzymes, a liver biopsy revealed inflammation with infiltration of immune T and B cells, and hepatocyte death. Treatment with prednisolone returned enzyme levels to normal (De Jonghe et al., 2020). Drug-reactive T cells were subsequently detected in trial participants with liver damage; these cells arose from  atabecestat/metabolite binding to antigen-presenting cells (Thomson et al., 2020).

See all trials at clinicaltrials.gov.

Clinical Trial Timeline

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 2/3
  • Study completed / Planned end date
  • Planned end date unavailable
  • Study aborted
Sponsor Clinical Trial 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035
Janssen NCT02260674
N=114
Janssen NCT02406027
N=90
Janssen NCT02569398
N=596

Last Updated: 18 Feb 2021

Comments

No Available Comments

Make a Comment

To make a comment you must login or register.

Further Reading

No Available Further Reading

Therapeutics

GSK2647544

Tools

Back to the Top

Overview

Name: GSK2647544
Synonyms: GSK-2647544
Therapy Type: Small Molecule (timeline)
Target Type: Cholesterol
Condition(s): Alzheimer's Disease
U.S. FDA Status: Alzheimer's Disease (Phase 1)
Company: GlaxoSmithKline (GSK)

Background

GSK2647544 is an inhibitor of lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2. Lp-PLA2 is a circulating enzyme secreted by monocytes and linked primarily to low-density lipoprotein in atherosclerotic plaques. Lp-PLA2 generates proinflammatory and oxidative mediators such as lysophosphatidylcholine and oxidized fatty acids, which promote development of atherosclerotic lesions. Lp-PLA2 is considered a risk factor for cardiovascular disease and for vascular inflammation. Dysregulated lipid metabolism has been implicated in stroke and dementia. Some studies have linked Lp-PLA2 to risk for dementia, but other studies show no correlation between Lp-PLA2 plasma concentrations and clinical dementia status (Davidson et al., 2012, Adibhatla and Thatcher, 2008). 

Findings

GSK began three Phase 1 studies with GSK2647544. Between October 2012 and April 2013, an initial safety study evaluated low doses of between 0.5 and 50 mg in 27 healthy volunteers. In August 2013, a small PET study began to assess brain penetrance of the compound, and in November 2013 another Phase 1 study began to evaluate escalating doses starting at 80 mg twice daily in young and elderly volunteers. GSK terminated both studies because low doses of GSK2647544 were found to inhibit the detoxifying liver enzyme cytochrome P450. GSK's February 2014 product pipeline still lists GSK2647544 as being in Phase 1 development for Alzheimer' disease. For all clinicial trials with GSK2647544 see clinicaltrials.gov.

GSK has another LP-PLA2 inhibitor, rilapladib, in Phase 2 development for Alzheimer's disease.

Last Updated: 07 Oct 2014

Comments

No Available Comments

Make a Comment

To make a comment you must login or register.

Further Reading

No Available Further Reading

Therapeutics

FRM-0334

Tools

Back to the Top

Overview

Name: FRM-0334
Synonyms: EVP-0334
Therapy Type: Small Molecule (timeline)
Target Type: Other (timeline)
Condition(s): Frontotemporal Dementia
U.S. FDA Status: Frontotemporal Dementia (Discontinued)
Company: FORUM Pharmaceuticals Inc.

Background

FRM-0334 is a histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor. HDACs are key enzymes in the epigenetic regulation of gene function. By removing acetyl groups from histone proteins in chromatin, HDACs compress the chromatin and in this way repress gene expression. The rationale behind HDAC inhibition is based on evidence that decreased transcription of certain genes represents an underlying pathophysiological mechanism in several neurological disorders, including frontotemporal dementia, Parkinson’s and Huntington’s diseases, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

In particular, HDAC inhibition appears to increase expression of progranulin (Cenik et al., 2011). Haploinsufficiency of the progranulin gene is a genetic cause of familial frontotemporal dementia, and levels of progranulin protein are reduced in the blood of patients with several neurodegenerative diseases. Progranulin is a secreted growth factor, and increasing its expression via HDAC inhibition is thought to be neuroprotective.

At the 2008 Society for Neuroscience conference, EVP-0334 was reported to selectively inhibit a subset of class I and II human HDACs with nanomolar IC50 values and good brain penetrance. In mice, oral administration was reported not only to increase acetylation of histones 2A, 3, and 4 in brain with a minimal effective dose of 10 mg/kg, but also to improve cognitive performance in novel object recognition and the Morris water maze at that same dose. This presentation also noted the safety of this compound when given for two weeks at 10 times the effective dose (Patzke et al., SfN presentation abstract, 2008; Leventhal et al., SfN presentation abstract, 2008; see Dec 2008 conference news).

At the 2009 Society for Neuroscience conference, EnVivo Pharmaceuticals scientists presented data in rats. In this model, too, the compound was reported to penetrate into the brain, increase acetylation of several histones there, and at the same doses improve memory as measured by performance in two different paradigms (Patzke et al., SfN presentation abstract, 2009).

In 2014, EnVivo changed its name to Forum Pharmaceuticals (Fierce Biotech news).

Findings

In Phase 1 evaluation, 70 healthy volunteers received daily oral doses of up to 400 mg FRM-0334 for two weeks. No severe adverse events were reported at any dose (Nov 2014 conference news).

In October 2014, Forum Pharmaceuticals began a Phase 2 study of FRM-0334 in 27 patients with prodromal to moderate frontotemporal dementia who carry an FTD-causing mutation in the progranulin gene. The trial compared a four-week course of a once-daily capsule of 300 or 500 mg FRM-0334 to placebo on safety and pharmacodynamic outcomes. Measures included change in plasma and CSF progranulin concentration, as well as changes in the plasma and CSF concentration of FRM-0034 and its metabolites. According to published results, the drug was well-tolerated but changed neither plasma nor CSF progranulin, or exploratory pharmacodynamic measures including CSF biomarkers, dementia ratings, and FDG-PET (Ljubenkov et al., 2021). Both doses produced similar plasma drug concentrations, which were likely insufficient to affect histone acetylation.

In June 2016, the company shut down (Xconomy news).

See clinicaltrials.gov.

Clinical Trial Timeline

  • Phase 2
  • Study completed / Planned end date
  • Planned end date unavailable
  • Study aborted
Sponsor Clinical Trial 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035
FORUM Pharmaceuticals Inc. NCT02149160
N=30

Last Updated: 06 Oct 2021

Comments

No Available Comments

Make a Comment

To make a comment you must login or register.

Further Reading

No Available Further Reading

Therapeutics

GC021109

Tools

Back to the Top

Overview

Name: GC021109
Therapy Type: Small Molecule (timeline)
Target Type: Inflammation (timeline)
Condition(s): Alzheimer's Disease
U.S. FDA Status: Alzheimer's Disease (Phase 1)
Company: GliaCure

Background

GC021109 is one of the first compounds in Alzheimer's clinical research that specifically target microglial cells. Mediators of microglial responses in neurodegenerative diseases with an inflammatory component have attracted renewed interest in drug development research, years after several NSAIDs failed clinical trials.

GC021109 reportedly is a prodrug for an agonist of microglial P2Y6 receptor. This is a metabotropic G-protein coupled receptor, whose natural ligand is adenosine diphosphate, a metabolite of ATP. Astrocytes release the "gliotransmitter" ATP in response to neuronal injury, the presence of cellular debris, and also the presence of Aβ plaques. P2Y6 signaling is thought to be involved in shifting the phenotype of microglia, which tend to surround amyloid plaques, from patrolling to phagocytic (Dong et al., 2010). Aβ42 increased ATP release in cultured astrocytes, and ATP was neuroprotective in slice culture (Mar 2012 news). P2Y6 and its family of purinergic receptors have been most studied in neuropathic pain (Inoue et al., 2009Bernier et al., 2013; Inoue and Tsuda, 2012). 

GC021109 has been reported in the biotech press to stimulate both microglial phagocytosis and inhibit microglial release of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-12; however, this information is not published in the peer-reviewed literature (Fidler 2014, Xconomy). The only published preclinical work on this compound reports efficacy in a mouse model of asthma (Chetty et al., 2018).

Findings

In September 2014, GliaCure started a Phase 1 trial at one site in New Jersey to compare five different doses, administered once, to placebo in about 44 healthy volunteers. This was a first-in-human safety study. It was completed in December 2014, weeks after GC021109 received Fast Track status by the FDA (press release).

A second Phase 1 tested safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of 28 days of multiple ascending doses in 39 people with mild to moderate Alzheimer’s disease. This study included plasma and CSF biomarkers such as IL-12, Aβ, and tau. Funded by the Alzheimer’s Drug Discovery Foundation, it was completed in October 2015. No further information was found on these trials.

See clinicaltrials.gov.

Last Updated: 04 Nov 2022

Comments

No Available Comments

Make a Comment

To make a comment you must login or register.

Further Reading

No Available Further Reading

Protocols

Tau Seed Detection via FRET Flow Cytometry

Tools

Back to the Top
Download Protocol

PI:
Affiliation:
Submitted by: Brandon Holmes
Posted Date: 01 Oct 2014

Brief Description

This assay was designed to detect small amounts of tau seeds in biological samples, such as brain homogenates from humans or rodent tauopathy models. HEK-293T cells stably expressing a human tau sequence were engineered to serve as biosensors of intracellular tau aggregation in a fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET)-based assay. Specifically, the biosensor cells express a tau repeat domain (RD) sequence containing the P301S mutation tagged to either cyan fluorescent protein (CFP) or yellow fluorescent protein (YFP).

References

Further Reading

No Available Further Reading

COMMENTS / QUESTIONS

No Available Comments

Make a comment or submit a question

To make a comment you must login or register.

Therapeutics

Blarcamesine

Tools

Back to the Top

Overview

Name: Blarcamesine
Synonyms: Anavex 2-73
Chemical Name: Tetrahydro-N,N-dimethyl-2,2-diphenyl-3-furanmethanamine hydrochloride
Therapy Type: Small Molecule (timeline)
Target Type: Other (timeline)
Condition(s): Alzheimer's Disease, Parkinson's Disease Dementia, Parkinson's Disease
U.S. FDA Status: Alzheimer's Disease (Phase 2/3), Parkinson's Disease Dementia (Phase 2), Parkinson's Disease (Phase 1)
Company: Anavex Life Science Corp.

Background

This compound is an agonist of the intracellular sigma-1 chaperone protein. Specifically, it is a mixed ligand for sigma1/muscarinic receptors. Expressed in most tissues and located at focal contacts between mitochondria and the endoplasmic reticulum, the sigma-1 receptor forms heterodimers with many other membrane receptors, and as such influences multiple cellular pathways and physiological processes. Blarcamesine reportedly binds the sigma-1 receptor in the high nanomolar and the muscarinic receptor in the low micromolar range.

The compound has been reported to have memory-preserving and neuroprotective effects in mice treated with the muscarinic receptor antagonist scopolamine, with synthetic Aβ oligomer injection, or with the NMDA receptor agonist dizocilpine (Villard et al., 2011). Other studies in the Aβ oligomer injection model suggest that blarcamesine may block tau hyperphosphorylation and protect mitochondria (Jan 2013 conference newsLahmy et al., 2013Lahmy et al., 2014). Activation of the sigma receptor promotes autophagy, which may contribute to blarcamesine’s neuroprotective actions by facilitating clearance of pathogenic proteins (Christ et al., 2019; Yang et al., 2019).

Findings

According to information previously on its website, Anavex conducted an initial Phase 1 study in healthy men in Germany that claimed to determine a maximal tolerated dose of 55 mg.

In August 2014, the company listed a Phase 2a study that was to compare oral and intravenous doses in a two-phase, 36-day crossover design followed by a six-month extension. The study design was originally registered as double-blind, though the treatment descriptions were open-label. It was to enroll 32 people with mild to moderate AD whose clinical diagnosis was consistent with findings on a CT or MRI scan. Intervention was to consist of a five-week period of either daily oral doses or daily infusions, which cross over to the other delivery mode at midpoint, followed by six months of once-daily oral dosing. The stated primary outcome was to determine the maximum tolerated dose. Secondary outcomes included pharmacokinetic blood tests as well as various efficacy measures such as MMSE, ADCS-ADLs, and EEG. This trial was conducted in Melbourne, Australia. It used no placebo control.

According to the clinicaltrials.gov changes record, in October 2014 Anavex entered changes switching study design to open-label, reducing the number of arms from eight to four, and reducing the number of exclusion criteria from 23 to four, with investigator discretion added. The study started recruiting in December 2014. In September 2015 the follow-up period of daily dosing was lengthened from six to 12 months (see clinicaltrials.gov changes record). In October 2019, the company added a four-year open-label extension, to run through November 2020.

According to a presentation at AAIC 2016, after 31 weeks of dosing in 28 patients, the drug met safety endpoints. Most adverse events were mild or moderate, with headache and dizziness the most frequent. Most people took 20 or 30 mg daily; the maximum tolerated dose was 48 mg. Scores on MMSE and ADCS-ADL remained steady. A subsequent paper showed safety to have been maintained out to 148 weeks. Statistical modeling of complete trial data linked changes in MMSE and ACDS-ADL scores over 57 weeks with blood blarcamesine levels, baseline MMSE, and genetic variants in the sigma receptor gene and catechol-O-methyltransferase genes (Hampel et al., 2020).

In July 2018, a Phase 2b/3 trial at 16 sites in Australia began enrolling 450 people with mild cognitive impairment or early dementia, plus PET or CSF confirmation of AD pathology. Participants are randomized to 50 or 30 mg blarcamesine or placebo, taken as capsules once daily for 48 weeks. The primary outcomes are change in ADAS-Cog and ADCS-ADL, safety, and tolerability. Secondary measures include CDR- SB, structural and functional MRI, and sleep score. The trial assesses blood and CSF concentrations of Aβ40, Aβ42, total and phosphorylated tau, NfL, YKL-40, neurogranin, and BACE1. A subgroup analysis is planned based on participants’ sigma receptors and COMT genotype. In October 2019, Anavex added a two-year, open-label safety extension and, in June 2020, it announced the trial would expand to sites in the United Kingdom and Canada (see press release).

The main trial was completed in June 2022, with a final enrollment of 509. According to top-line results presented at the 2022 CTAD conference in San Francisco, both dose groups were combined and compared to placebo. Analyzed in this way, the drug was reported to slow decline on the ADAS-Cog by 45 percent and on the secondary CDR-SB by 27 percent. Graphs plotting the treatment and placebo group's values on outcome measures over time were not shown. Data was not presented for the co-primary, the ADCS-ADL. In the safety analysis, dizziness and confusion occurred in 25 and 13 percent of patients taking blarcamesine, respectively, compared to 5.6 and 2.5 percent in the placebo group (see slides).

At the August 2024 AAIC, the company showed additional data, reporting that treatment with either dose was associated with an approximately 2-point difference in the ADAS-Cog13 and 0.5-point difference in CDR-SB after 48 weeks, which were statistically significant. This was presented to translate to 35 percent less decline in the ADAS-Cog and 25 percent less on the CDR-SB in the treated group. The ADCS-ADL did not differ between treatment and placebo groups. The Clinical Global Impression declined less on drug, as did measures of brain volume, gray matter volume, and ventricular enlargement. The Aβ42/40 ratio in plasma was increased. Other biomarkers showed numerical improvement, but changes were not statistically significant. The company plans to apply for European marketing approval in 2024, based on the cognitive endpoint results (press release). The open-label extension finished in June 2024.

This compound is also in development for Parkinson’s disease dementia and Rett Syndrome (Ette et al., 2023). Top-line results from a placebo-controlled, Phase 2 PDD study were presented at the 2020 CTAD conference. It enrolled 132 participants, and treatment with 30 or 50 mg daily for 14 weeks was reported to result in improvements in memory and attention measures compared to placebo. An open-label extension ran until June 2022. Anavex in February 2021 received Michael J. Fox Foundation funding for a pharmacokinetics/CNS exposure study in 24 people with Parkinson's disease.

For Rett Syndrome (Kaufmann et al., 2019), Anavex announced symptomatic improvements for a 31-patient Phase 2 study (Dec 2020 press release). A Phase 3 trial of 31 adult patients was completed in September 2021, and the company announced positive top-line results in February 2022 (press release), though the trial is mired in controversy (BusinessWire, BioSpace). A Phase 2/3 trial in 92 pediatric patients began in July 2020 and ran until June 2023.

In November 2022, blarcamesine received Orphan Drug Designation from the U.S. FDA for Fragile X syndrome. The company has published positive preclinical results in mouse models of this disease (Cogram et al., 2022; Reyes et al., 2021).

In May 2024, two related class-action lawsuits were filed against Anavex Life Sciences Corporation (8 May PR Newswire, 8 May PR Newswire).

For trial details, see clinicaltrials.gov.

Clinical Trial Timeline

  • Phase 2
  • Study completed / Planned end date
  • Planned end date unavailable
  • Study aborted
Sponsor Clinical Trial 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035
Anavex Life Science Corp. NCT02244541
N=32

Last Updated: 19 Aug 2024

Further Reading

External Resources

  1. Red flags fly over Anavex: What’s stopping the drug maker from enrolling U.S., European patients in trials?
  2. Lead Plaintiff Appointed in Anavex Fraud Suit

Therapeutics

AAB-003

Tools

Back to the Top

Overview

Name: AAB-003
Synonyms: PF-05236812
Therapy Type: Immunotherapy (passive) (timeline)
Target Type: Amyloid-Related (timeline)
Condition(s): Alzheimer's Disease
U.S. FDA Status: Alzheimer's Disease (Discontinued)
Company: Janssen, Pfizer

Background

AAB-003 is a humanized version of the anti-Aβ mouse antibody 3D6 and a derivative of bapineuzumab (AAB-001). AAB-003 was modified to differ from bapineuzumab in its Fc fraction in hopes of reducing the antibody’s effector function on microglial activation. The rationale was that this would avoid amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA), a complication of bapineuzumab treatment (Crespi et al., 2014; Moreth et al., 2013).

Findings

Starting in September 2010, Pfizer and Janssen AIP conducted a double-blind Phase 1 trial with an open-label extension at centers in the United States and South Korea. The adaptive trial compared multiple infusions each of five different doses of AAB-3 to placebo in 88 patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease who had an MRI scan consistent with their clinical diagnosis. The 41-week trial measured safety parameters including MRI evidence of ARIA. Secondary measures included immunogenicity of the antibody, biomarker CSF measurements of Aβ and tau, as well as cognitive and clinical scales such as the ADAS-cog, DAD, and others. In July 2011, the open-label extension study started enrolling people who had completed the blinded trial for a further year of treatment and observation on the same outcome measures. This trial was completed in August 2014. According to published results, AAB-003 showed dose-dependent increases in plasma Aβ but no change CSF Aβ, and ARIA and microhemorrhages (Delnomdedieu et al 2016). 

For all clinical trials on AAB-003, see clinicaltrials.gov.

Last Updated: 02 Feb 2018

Comments

No Available Comments

Make a Comment

To make a comment you must login or register.

Further Reading

No Available Further Reading

Therapeutics

MEDI1814

Tools

Back to the Top

Overview

Name: MEDI1814
Therapy Type: Immunotherapy (passive) (timeline)
Target Type: Amyloid-Related (timeline)
Condition(s): Alzheimer's Disease
U.S. FDA Status: Alzheimer's Disease (Phase 1)
Company: AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly & Co.

Background

Developed originally at MedImmune, now part of AstraZeneca, this antibody is being developed jointly by AstraZeneca and Eli Lilly. MEDI1814 binds to monomeric Aβ42. According to researchers at Lilly, MEDI1814 is not being developed based on its peripheral binding and the peripheral sink hypothesis, as was solanezumab, a prior antibody targeting monomeric Aβ40 and 42. Rather, MEDI1814 development will focus on CNS compartments (personal communication).

MEDI1841 is an IgG1 specific for the C-terminus of Aβ42. A triple mutation in its Fc region weakens binding to microglia, a strategy to avoid ARIA (Nov 2015 news).

No peer-reviewed preclinical data on this antibody has been published. According to meeting abstracts, the antibody, delivered either into the brain or systemically, prevented synaptic toxicity induced by administration of Aβ42 aggregates in rats (Ondrejcak et al., 2017). MEDI1814 was also reported to increase total and decrease free CSF Aβ42 in mice, rats, and cynomolgus monkeys (Billinton et al., 2017).

Findings

In February 2014, AstraZeneca started a multicenter Phase 1 trial in the U.S., which was to enroll 242 people with mild to moderate Alzheimer's. The study evaluated single- and multiple-ascending doses of intravenously and subcutaneously delivered antibody and placebo. Outcomes included measures of safety, pharmacokinetics, and immunogenicity of the antibody, as well as pharmacodynamics of blood and CSF Aβ concentrations. This trial also planned to correlate results with ApoE genotype and test the usefulness of a new cognitive tool called MCI screen. In 2015, the enrollment target was reduced to 121. The trial was completed in September 2016, and data presented (May 2017 conference news; Aug 2017 conference news).

The study ultimately enrolled 77 people. In the single-dose phase, 45 participants received 25, 100, 300, 900, or 1,800 mg or placebo by IV infusion, or 100 mg subcutaneously. In the multiple-dose regimen, 32 participants received three infusions of 300, 900, or 1,800 mg or placebo, or 200 mg subcutaneously, at four-week intervals. In a 16-week follow-up, the investigators reported no serious adverse events. The most common complaints were dizziness, headache, and diarrhea, which appeared unrelated to dose. There were no injection or infusion reactions, or changes in vital signs. MRI scans found no evidence of ARIA-E or ARIA-H. Pharmacokinetics were similar to other antibodies, with a half-life in blood of 17 to 20 days, and brain levels of 0.1 to 0.6 percent of those in plasma. After dosing, plasma and CSF total Aβ42 rose. Free CSF Aβ42 fell to undetectable levels after multiple 900 mg doses. Aβ40 did not change. Data on exploratory fluid biomarkers, presented at the November 2020 CTAD conference, showed a statistically significant 20 percent decrease in plasma NfL in the 1,800 mg multiple dose cohort. Also seen was a trend to reduction in plasma pTau207, but no significant changes in plasma or CSF pTau181, total Tau, or neurogranin were observed.

See clinicaltrials.gov.

Last Updated: 17 Dec 2020

Comments

No Available Comments

Make a Comment

To make a comment you must login or register.

Further Reading

No Available Further Reading

Therapeutics

Donanemab

Tools

Back to the Top

Overview

Name: Donanemab
Synonyms: N3pG-Aβ Monoclonal Antibody, LY3002813, Kisunla
Therapy Type: Immunotherapy (passive) (timeline)
Target Type: Amyloid-Related (timeline)
Condition(s): Alzheimer's Disease
U.S. FDA Status: Alzheimer's Disease (Approved)
Company: Eli Lilly & Co.

Background

Donanemab, aka N3pG, is a humanized IgG1 monoclonal antibody developed from mouse mE8-IgG2a. This biologic drug recognizes Aβ(p3-42), a pyroglutamate form of Aβ that is aggregated in amyloid plaques. Most Aβ antibodies in therapeutic development bind various soluble or insoluble species but have low affinity to deposited amyloid plaques. The rationale behind donanemab is that targeting deposited plaque itself is necessary to clear existing amyloid burden from the brain, rather than merely prevent deposition of new plaques or growth of existing plaques. Some previous plaque-binding antibodies have been abandoned because they caused microhemorrhages in the brain. The mE8 antibody was reported to clear plaques in mice without causing microhemorrhages (Demattos et al., 2012). 

At the 2014 AAIC conference, Lilly reported that a randomized preclinical study of combination therapy with N3pG and the BACE inhibitor LY2811376 cleared more than 80 percent of amyloid from the brains of PDAPP-transgenic mice, compared to about 50 percent clearance each for the respective monotherapies. Neuropathology studies showed that donanemab removed both cored and diffuse plaques (see Jul 2014 conference news).

In postmortem brain tissue from people with AD or Down's syndrome, donanemab bound to a subset of roughly one-third of amyloid plaques, and strongly reacted with the plaque core. It recognized vascular amyloid similarly to a pan-Aβ antibody. In brain tissue from AD mice, the antibody detected intraneuronal Aβ (Bouter et al., 2022). The antibody bound to cerebral amyloid angiopathy fibrils isolated from human brain, in proportion to the amount of pyroglutamate-modified Aβ the fibrils contained (Soderberg et al., 2024; see also Nov 2023 conference news).

Findings

From May 2013 to August 2016, Lilly ran a Phase 1 study in 100 people with mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer's disease, or mild Alzheimer's disease, in the United States and Japan. Participants had to have a positive amyloid PET scan. This seven-arm study evaluated five intravenous doses from 0.1 mg/kg to 10 mg/kg, infused monthly up to four times, and a single subcutaneous injection against placebo for safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics. At the 2016 AAIC conference in Toronto, Lilly presented results from 49 patients, average age 74, who had completed the trial. Thirty-seven volunteers received a single initial dose, 12 placebo. After adverse-event monitoring, they received up to four additional monthly infusions of the same dose; people in the 0.1mg/kg cohort subsequently received 0.3mg/kg. The highest dose was reported to reduce plaque load in the brain, though that group had but six participants. Overall, their mean florbetapir SUVR fell from 1.65 at baseline by 0.26 over seven months, corresponding to a 40 percent reduction. No cases of ARIA-E were seen in this small trial, but there were two asymptomatic cases of ARIA-H. The antibody was reported to be strongly immunogenic. In the multiple-dose phase, six of the 37 patients had an infusion reaction with chills, flushing, dizziness, rash, and fever, and anti-drug antibodies in plasma (Aug 2016 conference newsIrizarry et al. 2016). Full trial results are published (Lowe et al., 2021). Only the 10 mg/kg dose reduced amyloid deposits, and the drug had a shorter than expected half-life of 10 days. Most people developed anti-drug antibodies within three months of dosing.

In December 2015, Lilly started a second Phase 1 study in 150 people with prodromal to moderate AD, again in the United States and Japan. This trial had three dosing regimens, the first consisting of a single dose of 10, 20, or 40 mg/kg, the second of 10 mg/kg every other week for 24 weeks, and the third of 10 or 20 mg/kg every month for 16 months. Participants were randomized 3:1 to drug or placebo. The study measured primarily donanemab's effect on brain amyloid load with florbetapir PET; secondary outcomes were blood pharmacokinetics of donanemab and auto-antibodies directed against this biologic drug. At the 2018 AAIC, Lilly reported that a six-month course of 20 mg/kg shrank amyloid load by an average of 70 centiloids, with three of the six people who had reached that timepoint falling below the threshold for amyloid positivity. About one in four participants developed ARIA-E, mostly asymptomatic. Nearly all patients made anti-drug antibodies, and one had an infusion reaction (Aug 2018 conference news). 

This trial ended in August 2019, having enrolled 61 people. According to a presentation at the 2019 CTAD conference, monthly doses of 10 or 20 mg/kg for 16 months reduced amyloid by an average of 90 to 100 centiloids. All five people on the higher dose fell below the amyloid-positivity threshold. As observed at the earlier timepoint, one-quarter of patients developed ARIA-E; two cases were symptomatic and resolved after dosing stopped (Dec 2019 conference news). Trial results were peer-reviewed and published (Lowe et al., 2021).

In December 2017, Lilly began TRAILBLAZER-ALZ, a combination trial of two investigational drugs targeting different points in the amyloid cascade. This Phase 2 study was to evaluate safety, tolerability, and efficacy of an 18-month course of donanemab alone and in combination with Lilly's BACE inhibitor LY3202626. It aimed to enroll 375 participants whose memories had been worsening for at least six months, who met a cutoff on the CogState Brief Battery, and who had positive flortaucipir PET scans between 1.15 and 1.46 SUVR. Within this range, people have detectable cognitive decline over one to two years, but are not yet at advanced disease stages. Because the antibody requires an infusion and the BACE inhibitor comes as a capsule, the three treatment arms in this blinded, placebo-controlled trial were as follows: One group received intravenous donanemab plus placebo administered orally, the second group received intravenous donanemab plus LY3202626 orally, the third group received both intravenous and oral placebo. Hence the trial was to evaluate the antibody alone and in combination with the BACE inhibitor, but not the BACE inhibitor alone. Donanemab was dosed at 700 mg monthly for the first three months, then 1,400 mg for up to 18 months. The primary outcome was change on the Integrated Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale (iADRS), a combined cognitive/functional measure for early stage AD developed by Lilly (Wessels et al., 2015). Secondary measures included the ADAS-Cog13, CDR-Sum of Boxes, MMSE, ADCS-iADL, as well as amyloid and tau PET and volumetric MRI. To ease the logistical burden of trial participation, this study offered rides to and from study sites via a partnership between the Global Alzheimer’s Platform Foundation and the ridesharing company Lyft. The study started up at 63 sites in North America and was set to run until December 2020.

In October 2018, Lilly discontinued the BACE inhibitor arm of this trial; evaluation of donanemab was completed in December 2020, with a final enrollment of 272 participants.

In January 2021, Lilly announced by press release that TRAILBLAZER-ALZ had met its primary endpoint, with donanemab slowing decline on the iADRS by 32 percent compared to placebo at 18 months (Jan 2021 news). The company claimed improvement on all secondary endpoints of cognition and function, although not all were statistically significant. Treatment resulted in an average reduction in amyloid plaque by 84 centiloids, from 108 at baseline. Safety was similar to earlier trials. ARIA-E developed in 27 percent of treated patients, with 6 percent becoming symptomatic. According to data presented at AD/PD and simultaneously published, two-thirds of treated participants were amyloid-negative by the end of the trial. Donanemab slowed the rate of accumulation of tau neurofibrillary tangles in the frontal cortex and other regions (Mar 2021 conference news; Mintun et al., 2021). All secondary clinical measures trended in favor of treatment, but only the ADAS-Cog13 slowed significantly, by 39 percent. In addition to ARIA-E, treated participants also had more ARIA-H, superficial siderosis due to small brain bleeds, and nausea. The groups did not differ in serious adverse events or death. Ninety percent of patients developed anti-drug antibodies. Like other anti-amyloid treatments, donanemab treatment accelerated brain shrinkage assessed by MRI. Loss of brain volume is sometimes attributed to amyloid removal; however, the extent of this effect and timing relative to donanemab administration may point to other causes, possibly inflammation (Ayton, 2021). In a “time saved” analysis, treatment resulted in an estimated 5 months delay in progression on the iADRS and CDR-SB (Dickson et al., 2023).

At the July 2021 AAIC, the company showed additional data from TRAILBLAZER-ALZ. Donanemab led to rapid amyloid reduction in the first six months of treatment, which was sustained to the end of the trial. Participants who cleared amyloid below a brain-wide threshold, and were switched to placebo, did not reaccumulate amyloid after one year. People with amyloid clearance also showed a reduction in tau burden in the temporal, parietal, and frontal lobes, and a significant decline in the biomarker plasma ptau217. At the end of the trial, ptau217 concentrations fell by 24 percent in the treated group, while rising 6 percent in placebo (see Aug 2021 conference news). A post hoc analysis of the data was subsequently published, showing that people with high baseline amyloid had greater plaque reduction in the first six months, but less chance of reaching complete clearance compared to those with lower brain amyloid. Slowing of tau accumulation was more pronounced in people with complete amyloid clearance, and in brain regions affected later in disease. The extent of amyloid reduction correlated with change on the iADRS clinical endpoint only in ApoE4 carriers (Shcherbinin et al., 2022). In October, Lilly published additional fluid biomarker results from this trial, showing that plasma GFAP had fallen, but plasma NfL continued to rise (Pontecorvo et al., 2022).

More data on side effects was presented at the April 2023 AD/PD conference. In Phase 2, 92 percent of participants developed neutralizing antibodies to donanemab. Those with high titers of anti-drug antibodies showed lower blood concentrations of donanemab between doses, less plaque clearance, and about one-quarter less efficacy. People with higher anti-drug antibodies were also more likely to have infusion reactions (Apr 2023 conference news). A population pharmacokinetic analysis from a Phase 1 and this Phase 2 trial reported that donanemab's elimination half-life was 11.8 days and that antidrug antibodies reduced donanemab exposure (Gueorguieva et al., 2023).

In November 2020, an open-label extension began to enroll 100 participants for a one-month validation of at-home assessments, followed by 18 months of donanemab. The primary endpoints are correlation between video teleconference and in-clinic scores on ADAS-Cog, ADCS-ADL, MMSE, CDR-SB in the first month, and safety over the entire dosing period. Secondary outcomes are changes in cognitive and functional measures, amyloid PET, and MRI from baseline to 18 months, as well as pharmacokinetics, and development of anti-donanemab antibodies. The extension finished in February 2024, with 94 participants.

In October 2020, Lilly began recruiting for TRAILBLAZER-ALZ 2, initially as a Phase 2 safety and efficacy trial in 500 people with early Alzheimer’s. Inclusion criteria are similar to TRAILBLAZER-ALZ, i.e., participants must have had a progressive and gradual memory decline for at least six months, MMSE scores between 20 and 28, and meet criteria on amyloid and tau PET scans. Participants will receive donanemab or placebo, with the primary outcome being change in CDR-Sum of Boxes after 18 months. Secondary measures include the MMSE, ADAS-Cog13, iADRS, and ADCS-iADL, amyloid and tau PET, and volumetric MRI, plus pharmacokinetics and measures of anti-donanemab antibodies. The treatment phase finished in April 2023 at 87 sites in the United States, Canada, Japan, The Netherlands, and Poland; study completion is anticipated in August 2025.

Subsequently, Lilly enlarged TRAILBLAZER-ALZ 2 to become a Phase 3 registration study with 1,800 participants. The ongoing study had already enrolled some people with tau-PET above 1.46 SUVR, but primary efficacy will be determined in 1,000 people whose tau burden is below this cutoff. The primary outcome is iADRS, and effectiveness will be judged using a disease-progression model, rather than solely on change at the final time point. As of October 15, 2021, 1,625 participants had been randomized (Nov 2021 conference news). Results were expected in the fall of 2023.

In June 2021, the FDA granted donanemab Breakthrough Therapy designation, to speed development and review. Lilly submitted a licensing application in October 2021, under the same accelerated approval pathway used for aducanumab, with rolling submission of trial data (press release).

In August 2021, Lilly and the Banner Alzheimer’s Institute began a placebo-controlled Phase 3 prevention trial. Called TRAILBLAZER-ALZ3, it aimed to enroll 3,300 cognitively normal people, age 55 to 80 and at high risk for AD based on elevated plasma ptau217. The primary outcome is time to clinical progression measured by the Clinical Dementia Rating–Global Score. After nine monthly infusions of donanemab or placebo, participants will be monitored every six months until 434 become cognitively impaired, defined as a score above zero on the CDR for two consecutive evaluations. Secondary outcomes include a battery of cognitive tests, steady-state donanemab concentration in plasma, and the incidence of anti-donanemab antibodies. This is a decentralized trial, where assessments and monitoring are done remotely using video calls and tablet computers; drug infusions, blood draws, and MRIs will be done at local facilities. Participants will report to study centers only for amyloid or tau-PET scans. In mid-2022, the minimum age was raised to 65, and in 2023, enrollment was adjusted downward to 2,600. The trial is running at more than 200 sites in the United States, Japan, and Puerto Rico until November 2027 (Jul 2021 news; Nov 2021 conference news).

In November 2021, Lilly began TRAILBLAZER-ALZ 4, a Phase 3, open-label, head-to-head comparison of plaque clearance by donanemab and Biogen’s Aduhelm. Two hundred participants with a positive amyloid PET scan and mild dementia were to be randomized to either aducanumab treatment per label or intravenous donanemab every four weeks for 18 months. The primary outcome is the number who reach complete plaque clearance after six months on each treatment, judged by florbetapir PET. Seventeen secondary outcomes all relate to amyloid PET measures out to 18 months. The trial, at 31 locations in the United States, reached primary completion with 140 participants in September 2022. According to results presented at the 2022 CTAD conference, donanemab removed four times more plaque than aducanumab in the first six months of treatment (Dec 2022 conference news). Thirty-eight percent of people on donanemab fell below the amyloid positivity threshold by six months, compared to 2 percent for aducanumab. Plasma p-tau217 fell 25 percent on donanemab, but not at all on aducanumab. ARIA-E was similar in both groups, occurring in 22 percent of participants. The trial was completed in September 2023, and results are posted at clinicaltrials.gov. Final data from the 18-month timepoint was presented at AD/PD 2024 (March 2024 conference news). Seventy-eight percent of donanemab recipients became amyloid negative, compared to 43 percent on aducanumab. Aria E occurred in 24 percent of the donanemab group, versus 35 percent of those on aducanumab.

In August 2022, Lilly registered TRAILBLAZER-ALZ 5, another Phase 3 safety and efficacy trial in participants with early symptomatic Alzheimer’s. The trial began in October 2022 to enroll 1,500 participants with the same entry criteria as TRAILBLAZER-ALZ 2. They will receive monthly infusions of donanemab or placebo, against a primary outcome of change on the iADRS at 18 months. The study will run at more than 100 sites in Argentina, Australia, China, Korea, Taiwan, and the U.K. until mid-2027. The company concurrently conducted a Phase 1 safety trial involving 36 healthy Chinese people in Beijing, which was completed in January 2023.

From October 2022 to July 2023, Lilly conducted a Phase 1 study assessing single-dose blood exposure and degradation in 42 healthy volunteers.

In January, 2023, the FDA rejected donanemab’s accelerated approval application, citing insufficient safety data. Fewer than 100 people had stayed on drug for one year in the Phase 2 trial (news).

In February 2023, a Phase 3 trial, TRAILBLAZER-ALZ6, began testing the effect of different donanemab dosing regimens on the frequency and severity of ARIA-E in people with early AD. The 800 participations are to be divided among four dose schedules, including placebo when required to preserve blinding, against a primary outcome of percent of participants with ARIA-E over six months. The study also measures amyloid plaque clearance, ARIA-H, pharmacokinetics, and anti-drug antibodies for up to two years. It is ongoing at 49 sites in the U.S. and U.K., with completion planned for May 2025.

On May 4, 2023, Lilly announced positive top-line results for Trailblazer-ALZ2 (news). In this Phase 3 study, treatment significantly slowed decline on the primary outcome of iADRS by 40 percent, and improved all secondary clinical endpoints. Incidence of ARIA was similar to Phase 2, with ARIA-E and ARIA-H affecting one quarter and one third of those on drug, respectively. Serious ARIA occurred in 1.6 percent of participants, and caused two deaths, with a third possibly related. The company said it planned to apply for FDA approval in the next months. Full results were presented at the Alzheimer’s Association International Conference in Amsterdam (July 2023 conference news), and published the same day (Sims et al. 2023). Significant slowing of cognitive decline was apparent after three months on treatment for the iADRS, and six months for the secondary outcome CDR-SB. This amounted to a 4.5 months delay in progression on the iADRS, and 7.5 months on the CDR-SB by the end of the study. People who became amyloid negative continued to show slower decline after stopping the antibody. Benefits were greatest for those with mild cognitive impairment, who had 60 percent slowing on iADRS. Treatment reduced blood p-Tau and GFAP biomarkers, but did not change tangle load assessed by tau PET. Twenty-five percent of participants developed ARIA, six percent were symptomatic, and two percent had serious symptoms. Three people on donanemab died from brain bleeds during the trial. Two were ApoE4 carriers; none were taking anticoagulants. Data presented at the 2023 CTAD conference showed that people with lower tau at baseline and younger in age benefited more from treatment (Nov 2023 conference news). A post hoc subgroup analysis of trial data, presented at the same conference, suggested that tangle accumulation slowed in people who had rapid removal of amyloid (Nov 2023 conference news). Donanemab’s safety and efficacy in the Japanese subgroup was reported to be comparable to the overall study population (Sato et al., 2024).

According to the company, Lilly in the second quarter of 2023 applied to the FDA for traditional approval of donanemab, and expected a decision in early 2024. Instead, the FDA decided to convene an advisory committee to review the trial data. On June 10, the committee voted unanimously that donanemab was effective for AD patients with mild cognitive impairment or mild dementia, and carried a favorable risk-benefit profile (press releaseJun 2024 news). On July 2, the FDA approved donanemab (Jul 2024 news). It will be marketed as Kisunla.

For all trials of this antibody, see clinicaltrials.gov.

Clinical Trial Timeline

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3
  • Study completed / Planned end date
  • Planned end date unavailable
  • Study aborted
Sponsor Clinical Trial 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035
Eli Lilly & Co. NCT03367403
N=266
Eli Lilly & Co. NCT04437511
N=1500
Eli Lilly & Co. NCT04640077
N=100

Last Updated: 10 Jul 2024

Comments

No Available Comments

Make a Comment

To make a comment you must login or register.

Further Reading

No Available Further Reading

Therapeutics

ABT-957

Tools

Back to the Top

Overview

Name: ABT-957
Synonyms: Alicapistat
Chemical Name: (2R)-1-benzyl-N-[4-(cyclopropylamino)-3,4-dioxo-1-phenylbutan-2-yl]-5-oxopyrrolidine-2-carboxamide
Therapy Type: Small Molecule (timeline)
Target Type: Other (timeline)
Condition(s): Alzheimer's Disease
U.S. FDA Status: Alzheimer's Disease (Discontinued)
Company: AbbVie

Background

This compound is an inhibitor of the calcium-dependent cysteine protease calpain. This enzyme has long been known to be highly active in Alzheimer’s disease brain (Saito et al., 1993), but its different isoforms, numerous substrates, and pleiotropic effects made drug discovery difficult. Calpain became an active therapeutic target as more specific inhibitors have become available. The structure, synthesis, and selectivity of ABT-957 has been published (Jantos et al., 2019).

Calpain is thought to play a role in several of the pathophysiological processes underlying neurodegeneration. For example, calpain functions in NMDR signaling cascades that lead to neuronal excitotoxicity. It has also been reported to mediate Aβ-induced synaptic dysfunction by cleaving the synaptic vesicle protein dynamin 1 (e.g., Wu et al., 2004Kelly et al., 2005). Calpain cleaves p35 to release p25, an activating protein for the tau kinase cyclin-dependent kinase 5, and excess calpain activation has been linked to hyperphosphorylation of tau and its subsequent aggregation into neurofibrillary tangles. In a tauopathy mouse model, genetic calpain reduction prevented neurodegeneration (see Noble et al., 2003Rao et al., 2014). 

Preclinical studies with small-molecule calpain inhibitors have shown improvement of behavioral deficits in models of excitotoxicity of the nucleus basalis of Meynert, a brain area involved in AD. This effect was attributed to the inhibitor’s ability to stanch cholinergic neurodegeneration. In hippocampal slice culture, calpain inhibition reportedly prevented both excitotoxic neuronal death and deficits in neurotransmission brought on by Aβ oligomers. In rats, calpain inhibition dose-dependently protected neurons against degeneration caused by Aβ oligomers, and it prevented gliosis (Nimmrich et al., 2008Nimmrich et al., 2010; Granic et al., 2010). 

Findings

In August 2014, AbbVie started enrolling 20 people with mild to moderate Alzheimer’s disease into a Phase 1 trial of ABT-957. This multicenter study planned to expose participants to the study drug or placebo twice daily for a week and measure pharmacokinetic and safety parameters. It was originally slated to end in March 2015, but after a temporary suspension was expected to run through February 2016. The study ended in March 2016 with 19 participants. 

In December 2015, a second Phase 1 study began enrolling 50 people with MCI due to AD or probable AD. This study was to be conducted in six U.S. states; and compare safety and tolerability of multiple doses of ABT-957 given twice daily for 12 weeks. In addition, this study was to measure CSF levels of spectrin breakdown product-145. SBDP-145 is considered a biomarker of calpain activity (Warren et al., 2007). This trial was terminated in June 2016 after enrolling only eight participants, citing insufficient target engagement based on preclinical data.

The results of these and additional trials in the Phase 1 program were subsequently published (Lon et al., 2018). Drug concentrations in the CNS did not reach levels sufficient to produce a pharmacodynamic effect, as assessed by changes in REM sleep behavior. The program was terminated.

For clinical trials of this compound, see clinicaltrials.gov.  

Last Updated: 04 Nov 2022

Comments

No Available Comments

Make a Comment

To make a comment you must login or register.

Further Reading

No Available Further Reading

Subscribe to ALZFORUM RSS